Iris Publishers - Current Trends in Clinical & Medical Sciences (CTCMS)
External Cortical Femoral Implant in A THP A Long Term Follow Up of a Clinical Case
Everyone, in his practice, had
patients with more or less severe brain dysfunction, one is hemiplegia [1].
What could happen for the patient from an orthopedic point of view, on the
lower limb when such a disease happens? The reduced use of the limb reduces the
pressure on the bearing bone and, from a physiological point of view, a
reduction of the mineralization. The bone becomes osteoporotic [2]. The
physical phenomenon is reversible when the pressure conditions are restored.
Here are two examples. This patient had a right haemorrhagic stroke few years
ago. He had a left hemiplegia and spent a long time in physiotherapy due to the
difficulty to walk. Note the thin both femoral cortical due to the bad
utilization of the left lower limb (Figure a). Few years later, he recovered a
best walk. Note the very good thickening due to the best support of his body
weight by the limb (Figure b). Adversingly, despite the severe coxarthrosis
note the good thickness of the femoral cortex before surgery (Figure a, b). Few
years later the patient had a hemiplegia. Note the increasing diameter of the
femoral medullary canal (Figure c). What would have happened if an
intramedullary implant was settle in it?
Scientific Reasons of this New
Concept
The choice of this implant’s
design was done in the aim of a more physiological respect of the bone
structures [3-5].
a) The joint elasticity is mainly
due to the cancellous bone of a joint. Most of the intra-medullary canal
implants destroy it. In this case the cancellous bone is in the upper femoral
metaphyseal neck, more or less in totality (Figure a, b).
b) The bone marrow has one of the
most important roles in bone physiology: vascularization, cells of bone
remodeling, blood cells, proteins and minerals are the major actors of the
normal bone life.
c) The periosteum is acting all
lifelong (even after 100 years) and covers all foreign bodies which are fixed
on the shaft, keeping a fixation stronger and stronger by time (Figure c, d).
d) The pressure on the calcar is
necessary to increase and maintain it thickness. A large crown on the upper
part of the implant rests firmly there so that there is no resorption [8-9].
Technical procedure
A cemented Charnley’s cup in
polyethylene was cemented in the acetabulum. An external stem implant in
titanium was fixed on the lateral cortex of the femoral shaft, below the
periosteum. A 22,2 mm diameter of the head was used on the right side. Four
years later, a non-cemented metal back acetabulum with a 22,2 diameter of the
head was placed on the left side. Insert in polyethylene. A lateral femoral
Implant in titanium was screwed. Screws of 5 mm of diameter for the femoral
shaft, 6 mm of diameter to fix the greater trochanter.
Clinical story and examination
Me T… Françoise is Born the 04 12
1938 - Her Height is 1.59m, her Weight is 59kg. This 80-year-old patient had a
bilateral coxarthrosis. When she was 51 years old, in 1989, she was operated on
the left side. Four years later, a THP as placed on the right side in 1993. She
was seen in clinic office in May 2019. Follow up: 30 years on the right side
Follow up: 26 years on the left side She has no pain. She can climb stairs up
and down without difficulty. Over three floors, she uses the ramp stairs. She
walks without help as long as she wants. One hour without stop She walks
without limping.
Functional scores
Postel-Merle d’Aubigné (PMA) Pain,
Mobility, Walk 4 grades: 18 excellent. Harris hip score: Douleur, function,
mobilité, absence de déformation Score jusquà 100: 90-100: excellent. Oxford
hip score: Activities of the daily Life. Auto-administrated survey with12 items
giving a score: 42-48: excellent.
Discussion
The first planning was to start
with a well-considered definition of the goal expected. It was to secure the femoral
implant on its support so that it would stay all day long, as long as patient’s
life, without physical activity limitation. The second question was followed by
the development of an effective strategy. Once establishing the goal and the
strategy, do we have worked backwards to identify the next steps? Have we reach
the goal expected? Can we be sure that the fémoral implant will be aware of
complications in 100%.
In fact, the purpose is to answer
to three questions:
a. Does bone physiology have been
respected? The answer is yes concerning the cancellous bone, the femoral
cortices, the role of the periosteum. There was no calcar resorption.
b. Do we have had any mechanical
complications such as: broken screws or broken plates. Yes, in a very small cases,
some screws fixing the greater trochanter broke. If the osteotomy of this
apophysis is consolidated, nothing will happen. In some case the lateral part
of the broken screws must be removed when painful. Since we have changed the
design of the screws, (6 mm of diameter) no one broke. Have we reach the goal?
In this experience, the answer is yes [4]. Not any femoral plate was removed.
All patients are either too old now or are in a very high place in the sky
where nobody can reach them or are still living with their implants.
Conclusion
The lateral femoral implant is,
according to this cohorte, one of the good solutions for a long implant’s life,
as long as the patient’s life, whatever his age [5-7]. But we should stress the
difficulty of its fixation on the upper femoral metaphysis. The greater
trochanteric osteotomy must be perfect. The screws must be of a good size and
length. The consolidation delay of this bone section must be respected. The
patient must walk with two crutches during this time with only a contact
support. Surgeon must keep in mind that he is not at all a simple machine to
operate. He must practice with his heart and must explain to his patient what
he will do and why he will do for it in order to reach the target [9]. In this
way, the surgeon does not destroy the intra-medullary bone marrow. He keeps as
much as possible the cervical cancellous bone (Figure a, b). The implant
applies a constant pressure on the femoral calcar [8], and the periosteum
osteogenic power covers by time the implant plate, connecting strongly
mechanically both bone and metal. This patient is
in good health, has a normal
activity for her age. Both femoral implants remain stable and will stay so
until the end of the story.
To read more about this article: https://irispublishers.com/ctcms/fulltext/external-cortical-femoral-implant-in-a-thp-a-long-term-follow-up-of-a-clinical-case.ID.000510.php
Indexing
List of Iris Publishers: https://medium.com/@irispublishers/what-is-the-indexing-list-of-iris-publishers-4ace353e4eee
Iris
publishers google scholar citations: https://scholar.google.co.in/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=irispublishers&btnG=
Comments
Post a Comment